| Journal of Phytological Sciences

Received: 17 August 2026; Revised: 24 September 2026; Accepted: 25 September 2026; Published Online: 29 September 2026.

J. Phytol. Sci., 2026, 1(1), 26903 | Volume 1 Issue 1 (September 2026) | DOI: https://doi.org/10.64189/ps.26903

This article is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC-BY-NC 4.0)

Lignin-Derived and Associated Polyphenolic

Compounds in Woody Plants: Structural Elucidation,

Synthetic Pathways, Characterization Techniques, and

Industrial Bioactivities

H. B. Roghan

and S. Vennila

Department of Agroforestry, Forest College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Mettupalayam,Tamil Nadu,

641301, India

Department of Agronomy, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Tiruvannamalai, Tamil

Nadu, 606753, India

*Email: roghanbalu@gmail.com (H. B. Roghan)

Abstract

Lignin is the second most abundant natural biopolymer on Earth, functioning as a primary structural matrix in

the secondary cell walls of woody plants. Composed of complex, cross-linked, hydroxylated, and methoxylated

phenylpropanoid units, lignin and its associated polyphenols possess unique structural flexibility, UV-shielding,

radical scavenging, and antimicrobial properties. Historically managed as a low-value byproduct of the pulp and

paper industry, recent biorefinery innovations have repositioned lignin as a crucial sustainable precursor for

high-value biomaterials, green composite fillers, and targeted biomedical carriers. This review provides a

rigorous, critical synthesis of lignin chemistry, detailing monolignol biosyntheses (p-coumaryl, coniferyl, and

sinapyl alcohols), radical coupling polymerization mechanisms, and taxonomic variations across gymnosperm

softwoods, angiosperm hardwoods, and woody bamboos. Modern structural characterization methodologies

including 2D 1H-13C HSQC NMR, 31P NMR, Py-GC/MS, SEC/GPC, and FTICR-MS are comprehensively evaluated

alongside commercial extraction protocols (kraft, organosolv, lignosulfonate, and soda processes).

Furthermore, quantitative performance metrics across antioxidant (DPPH IC50), UV-blocking (SPF values),

antimicrobial (MIC), and drug-delivery (encapsulation efficiency) domains are critically synthesized. Technical

limitations regarding structural heterogeneity, condensation reactions, sulfur contamination, commercial

scalability, life cycle assessments (LCA), and regulatory hurdles for biomedical translation are thoroughly

examined. This work establishes an integrated framework bridging taxonomic lignin chemistry with industrial

valorization and sustainable bioeconomy strategy.

Keywords: Lignin valorization; Technical lignins; Structural elucidation; 2D HSQC NMR; Phenylpropanoid

biosynthesis; Quantitative bioactivities; Biorefinery scalability.

1. Introduction

Lignin is an intricate, highly branched aromatic macromolecule that accounts for approximately 15% to 35% of

the dry lignocellulosic biomass in vascular plants, serving as an indispensable structural support matrix

alongside cellulose and hemicellulose.

[1,2]

Deposited predominantly during secondary cell wall formation, lignin

imparts essential mechanical strength, rigidity, and stem uprightness, while rendering vascular tissues

impermeable to aqueous fluid transport.

[3,4]

Furthermore, lignification acts as a robust biochemical defense

mechanism against pathogen infection, microbial degradation, and environmental oxidative stresses.

[2,5]

From

a chemical perspective, lignin represents the most abundant renewable reservoir of natural aromatic structures

on Earth, making it a pivotal feedstock for transitioning from fossil-dependent chemical industries to a

sustainable bio-based economy.

[6,7]

Despite its immense natural abundance-generated in excess of 50 million

tons annually as a byproduct of industrial pulp, paper, and emerging biorefinery operations-lignin remains

substantially underutilized.

[8,9]

Historically, over 95% of industrial technical lignins, particularly kraft lignin and

lignosulfonates, have been incinerated on-site as low-value thermal fuel to recover process chemicals and

generate operational steam.

[8,10]

This practice stems primarily from lignin's inherent structural heterogeneity,

high polydispersity, thermal instability, and operational recalcitrance caused by unpredictable radical

condensation during chemical pulping.

[7,11]

However, driven by modern advancements in analytical

characterization, targeted depolymerization, green fractionation, and nanostructural engineering, lignin is

rapidly transitioning from an under-valued waste stream to a high-value platform material.

[12,13]

While numerous reviews have broadly examined lignin isolation or specific chemical modifications, several

major knowledge gaps persist in the current literature. First, conventional reviews frequently discuss lignin in

generic terms without adequately differentiating the distinct structural traits imparted by specific woody plant

taxa (e.g., gymnosperm softwoods vs. angiosperm hardwoods vs. woody bamboos).

[2,14]

Second, existing

literature often provides purely qualitative assertions regarding lignin bioactivities-such as 'strong antioxidant

capacity' or 'excellent antimicrobial action'-without critically synthesizing quantitative benchmarks such as

DPPH scavenging IC50 values, UV protection factors (SPF), or minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC).

[15,16]

Third, there is a prominent disconnect between laboratory-scale claims of biomedical efficacy and the practical

economic, regulatory, and scalability constraints governing commercial translation.

[13,17]

Finally, many reviews

fail to integrate recent advances in high-resolution analytical techniques, such as 2D 1H-13C Heteronuclear

Single Quantum Coherence Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (HSQC NMR) and Quantitative 31P NMR, with

commercial process economics and Life Cycle Assessments (LCA).

[18,19]

To address these critical knowledge gaps,

this review provides a comprehensive and rigorous synthesis of lignin chemistry, biosynthesis, advanced

analytical characterization, and industrial applications, specifically focused on woody plant taxa. By

establishing explicit linkages between taxonomic origins, isolation chemistries, quantitative performance

metrics, commercial scalability, and environmental sustainability, this work offers an integrated blueprint for

researchers and bioprocess engineers seeking to unlock the full economic and biomedical potential of lignin-

derived polyphenols.

2. Methodology and PRISMA selection strategy

To ensure methodological rigor, transparency, and comprehensive coverage of recent literature, a systematic

literature search was conducted adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-

Analyses (PRISMA) statement guidelines.

[20]

Primary literature searches were executed across Web of Science,

Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar covering publication dates from January 2000 through September 2026.

The search strategy utilized combinations of Boolean operators with core keywords: ('lignin' OR 'technical

lignin' OR 'lignin nanoparticles') AND ('woody plants' OR 'softwood' OR 'hardwood') AND ('structural

elucidation' OR '2D HSQC NMR' OR '31P NMR') AND ('biosynthesis' OR 'monolignols') AND ('antioxidant' OR

'antimicrobial' OR 'drug delivery' OR 'UV-shielding'). Furthermore, specific searches focused on commercial

processing ('kraft', 'organosolv', 'lignosulfonate', 'soda') and techno-economic evaluation ('life cycle

assessment', 'scalability', 'biodegradability'). The primary database search yielded 1,420 records. Following

duplicate removal (n = 380), 1,040 titles and abstracts were screened for thematic relevance. Articles were

included if they presented primary quantitative data or critical theoretical advancements regarding woody

plant lignin biosynthesis, advanced analytical characterization, industrial extraction protocols, or specific

bioactivity performance metrics. Studies exclusively focusing on herbaceous agricultural residues or non-

woody grasses were excluded unless required for explicit structural comparisons. The focus was on woody

taxa based on their dominant share in industrial forestry, higher recalcitrance, unique S/G/H monomeric ratios

compared to monocots, and distinct commercial valorization pathways. A total of 185 full-text articles were

assessed for eligibility, resulting in 65 highly rigorous primary research articles, authoritative review papers,

and technical reports selected for full synthesis within this review (Fig 1).

Fig. 1: PRISMA Flow Diagram illustrating literature identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion process.

3. Biosynthetic and polymerization pathways

3.1. General phenylpropanoid enzymatic cascade

Lignin biosynthesis originates within the cytosol via the general phenylpropanoid pathway, utilizing the

aromatic amino acid L-phenylalanine (and to a lesser extent L-tyrosine in certain monocots and woody grasses)

produced by the shikimate pathway.

[2,21]

The initial entry step is catalyzed by Phenylalanine Ammonia-Lyase

(PAL), which performs non-oxidative deamination of L-phenylalanine to generate trans-cinnamic acid.

[21,22]

Successive hydroxylation and methylation reactions establish the functional aromatic substitution patterns

characteristic of monolignol precursors.

[2,23]

Trans-cinnamic acid is hydroxylated at the C4 position by

Cinnamate 4-Hydroxylase (C4H), a membrane-bound Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase, producing p-

coumaric acid.

[22]

Activation of p-coumaric acid to p-coumaroyl-CoA is mediated by 4-Coumarate:CoA Ligase

(4CL).

[24]

The metabolic pathway branches further through downstream enzymes: Hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA

Shikimate/Quinate Hydroxycinnamoyl Transferase (HCT) and p-Coumarate 3-Hydroxylase (C3H) catalyze the

conversions leading to caffeoyl-CoA.

[2,24]

Caffeoyl-CoA is subsequently O-methylated at the C3 position by

Caffeoyl-CoA O-Methyltransferase (CCoAOMT) to yield feruloyl-CoA.

[25]

Reduction of these hydroxycinnamoyl-

CoA thioesters to their corresponding aldehydes is executed by Cinnamoyl-CoA Reductase (CCR), followed by

NADPH-dependent reduction to hydroxycinnamyl alcohols (monolignols) catalyzed by Cinnamyl Alcohol

Dehydrogenase (CAD).

[21,26]

The synthesis of sinapyl alcohol, the building block for syringyl (S) lignin units,

requires Ferulate 5-Hydroxylase (F5H), a specialized Cytochrome P450 enzyme that hydroxylates

coniferaldehyde or coniferyl alcohol at the C5 position, followed by O-methylation via Caffeic Acid O-

Methyltransferase (COMT).

[2,27]

Differential regulation, expression, and substrate specificity of these pathway

enzymes directly dictate the proportion of p-coumaryl alcohol (yielding p-hydroxyphenyl, H units), coniferyl

alcohol (yielding guaiacyl, G units), and sinapyl alcohol (yielding syringyl, S units) synthesized within plant cells.

[2,28]

3.2. Radical coupling polymerization and combinatorial lignification

Following cytoplasmic synthesis, monolignols are transported across the plasma membrane into the apoplastic

cell wall matrix via ABC transporters and passive diffusion mechanisms.

[2,29]

In the apoplast, secretable oxidative

enzymes-specifically cell wall-bound Class III Peroxidases (utilizing hydrogen peroxide, H2O2) and Laccases

(utilizing molecular oxygen, O2)-catalyze the one-electron oxidation of monolignol phenolic hydroxyl groups to

form resonance-stabilized phenoxy radicals.

[29,30]

Unusually for biological macromolecules, lignification is not a

template-driven process; instead, it proceeds via purely chemical, combinatorial radical coupling of these

phenoxy radicals.

[6,31]

The delocalization of the unpaired electron across the aromatic ring and the conjugated

cinnamyl alcohol side chain (at positions O-4, C-1, C-3, C-5, and C-β) permits diverse radical coupling modes.

[6]

The primary coupling event typically involves a monolignol radical reacting at its C-β position with an elongated

phenolic end-group of a growing polymer, resulting in dominant linkage types such as β-O-4' (aryl ether), β-β'

(resinol), β-5' (phenylcoumaran), 5-5' (biphenyl), and 4-O-5' (diaryl ether).

[6,32]

This non-deterministic coupling

mechanism accounts for the extreme macromolecular heterogeneity, polydispersity, and optical inactivity

observed in natural plant lignins.

[6]

Table 1: Comparative structural traits, monolignol proportions, and linkage profiles across major woody plant

taxonomic divisions

[2,6,14,33-36]

Taxonomic

Group

Representative

Species

Monolignol

Composition

Dominant Linkages

S/G Ratio

Structural

Characteristics

Gymnosperm

Softwoods

Pinus taeda,

Picea abies,

Abies alba

G (>95%), H (<5%)

β-O-4 (45-50%), 5-5

(10-15%), β-5 (9-

12%)

N/A (G-

dominated)

Highly cross-linked,

dense C-C network,

elevated recalcitrance

Angiosperm

Hardwoods

Populus

trichocarpa,

Betula pendula

G (30-50%), S (50-

70%), H (<2%)

β-O-4 (60-75%), β-β

(5-10%), β-5 (3-6%)

1.2 - 3.0

Linear architecture,

higher β-O-4 content,

lower thermal

recalcitrance

Woody

Bamboos /

Monocots

Bambusa

vulgaris,

Dendrocalamus

strictus

G (40-50%), S (40-

50%), H (5-10%)

β-O-4 (50-60%),

ester/ether

hydroxycinammates

0.8 - 1.5

Abundant

hydroxycinnamic acids

(ferulate/coumarate)

cross-linking

4. Taxonomic diversity and structural characteristics

4.1. Structural classification across woody taxa

Lignin composition varies systematically across major taxonomic divisions of woody plants, driven by

evolutionary adaptations in monolignol biosynthetic pathways.

[2,14]

Gymnosperm softwoods (e.g., Pinus, Picea,

Abies) synthesize lignin almost exclusively from coniferyl alcohol, resulting in 'guaiacyl lignin' composed of

>95% G-units with minor amounts (<5%) of H-units.

[6,33]

Because G-units possess an unsubstituted aromatic C-

5 position, softwood lignins undergo high degrees of intramolecular cross-linking during lignification, forming

dense 5-5' and β-5' carbon-carbon bonds that impart high thermal recalcitrance.

[6,34]

In contrast, angiosperm

hardwoods (e.g., Populus, Betula, Eucalyptus) synthesize both coniferyl and sinapyl alcohols, producing

'guaiacyl-syringyl (G-S) lignin' with typical S/G ratios ranging from 1.0 to 3.0.

[2,35]

The presence of methoxyl

groups at both C-3 and C-5 in syringyl units blocks C-C coupling at C-5, favoring linear, ether-linked (β-O-4')

polymer chains that are chemically more susceptible to depolymerization.

[35]

Woody monocots and bamboos

(e.g., Bambusa, Dendrocalamus) incorporate substantial amounts of p-coumaryl alcohol alongside G and S units,

forming 'H-G-S lignin' characterized by significant ester- and ether-bound p-coumaric and ferulic acid pendant

groups.

[14,36]

Table 1 summarizes the key structural traits, linkage profiles, and molecular characteristics across

woody taxonomic groups.

4.2. Chemical structures of monolignols and key interunit linkages

To provide clear chemical elucidation, Fig. 2 presents the complete molecular structures of the primary

monolignol precursors (p-coumaryl alcohol, coniferyl alcohol, and sinapyl alcohol) alongside the explicit

chemical linkages that define the polymer backbone, including β-O-4' aryl ether, β-β' resinol, β-5'

phenylcoumaran, 5-5' biphenyl, 4-O-5' diaryl ether, and β-1' diphenylpropane structures.

[6,32]

Fig. 2: Molecular structures of fundamental monolignol building blocks and primary interunit linkages.

5. Advanced structural characterization techniques

Precise qualitative and quantitative characterization of lignin is essential for establishing structure-property-

activity relationships.

[18,37]

Given lignin's structural complexity, modern analytical strategies rely on a

complementary suite of high-resolution spectroscopic, chromatographic, and mass spectrometric methods.

[18,

19]

Table 2 details the primary analytical methodologies, operational principles, key structural parameters

resolved, and inherent analytical limitations. Although advanced analytical methodologies have substantially

deepened our understanding of lignin chemistry, critical technical limitations hinder their routine application.

State-of-the-art 2D H





C HSQC NMR provides unambiguous interunit linkage quantification (-O-4', -',

-5'), yet it suffers from heavy signal overlapping in the aliphatic side-chain region (







   

ppm) and requires complete sample solubilization—an ongoing challenge for highly condensed technical

lignins without harsh chemical derivatization (e.g., acetylation). Quantitative P



NMR resolves aliphatic,

phenolic, and carboxylic hydroxyl groups with precision (in mmol/g), but relies on moisture-sensitive

phosphitylation reagents (e.g., 2-chloro-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaphospholane, TMDP) that rapidly

hydrolyze in trace water, leading to artifactual hydroxyl overestimation. Furthermore, the Size-Exclusion

Chromatography (SEC/GPC) frequently overestimates molecular weight distributions (



, 



) due to

intermolecular aggregation via non-covalent - stacking in organic solvents, while Analytical Py-GC/MS yields

incomplete quantification owing to secondary thermal cleavage reactions during flash pyrolysis. A combined

multi-technique analytical protocol remains imperative to cross-validate linkage profiles and functional group

quantities.

Table 2: Advanced analytical techniques for structural elucidation, functional group quantification, and

macromolecular profiling of lignin

[18,19,37,38]

Analytical Technique

Operational Principle

Key Parameters

Resolved

Advantages

Limitations

2D 1H-13C HSQC

NMR

Heteronuclear single

quantum coherence

cross-polarization

Quantification of β-O-

4, β-β, β-5 linkages;

H:G:S ratios; S/G ratio

Definitive

fingerprinting of

linkage profiles and

aromatic units

Requires complete

sample dissolution;

overlapping signal

region

Quantitative 31P

NMR

Phosphitylation of

hydroxyl groups using

TMDP followed by 31P

NMR

Precise absolute

quantification

(mmol/g) of aliphatic,

phenolic (H,G,S), and

carboxylic -OH

Unmatched

resolution of distinct

hydroxyl functional

environments

Derivatization step

required; moisture-

sensitive reagents

Py-GC/MS

Analytical flash

pyrolysis coupled with

gas chromatography-

mass spectrometry

Phenolic monomer

profiling,

guaiacyl/syringyl

cleavage products,

origin verification

Rapid micro-scale

analysis; no complex

sample prep needed

Secondary pyrolytic

reactions can alter

quantitative fidelity

SEC / GPC

Size-exclusion

chromatography with

UV/MALLS/RI

detection

Molecular weight

distribution (Mn,

Mw) and

polydispersity index

(PDI)

Essential for

macromolecular size

profiling and

fractionation

Apparent Mw

depends on

calibration standards

and solvent

association

FTICR-MS

Fourier-transform ion

cyclotron resonance

mass spectrometry

Ultra-high resolution

molecular formula

assignment of

depolymerized

fractions

Resolves thousands

of individual

molecular species

simultaneously

High instrument cost;

complex ionization

matrix effects

FTIR / Raman

Vibrational

spectroscopy of

functional bonds

Identification of

aromatic ring

vibrations, carbonyl,

and hydroxyl stretch

modes

Non-destructive,

rapid qualitative

monitoring

Low quantitative

precision due to

broad overlapping

bands

6. Commercial extraction processes and technical lignins

The chemical and physical properties of isolated 'technical lignins' are profoundly governed by the industrial

extraction process.

[8,10]

Commercial pulping processes modify native lignin structures through ether linkage

cleavage, variable condensation reactions, and incorporation of non-lignin elements (e.g., sulfur).

[8,39]

Table 3

presents a comparative critical analysis of major commercial and emerging isolation processes.

Table 3: Comparative evaluation of major technical lignin extraction processes

[8,10,39,40]

Process

Yield

Purity

Key Chemical Traits

Advantages

Technical Limitations

Kraft

High

Moderate

Contains   

sulfur; highly

condensed;

hydrophobic

Industrially established

(  global

production); cheap

feedstock supply

Odorous sulfur

contamination; high

structural

heterogeneity; dark

color

Organosolv

Moderate

High

Sulfur-free; low 



;

high reactive phenolic

OH

High chemical purity;

preserved -O-4' linkages;

high reactivity

High organic solvent

recovery costs;

operational volatility;

expensive

Sulfite /

Lignosulfonate

High

Moderate

High sulfur (   as

SO



H); water-soluble

Direct water solubility;

strong

surfactant/dispersing

agent

High inorganic ash and

sugar impurities;

sulfur content limits

refining

Soda

Moderate

High

Sulfur-free; carboxylic

acid rich; moderate

condensation

Sulfur-free stream; well-

suited for non-woody &

hardwood feeds

Lower recovery yields

from softwoods;

variable ash content

The commercial adoption of technical lignins is heavily governed by the chemical trade-offs inherent to each

pulping process. While Kraft and Sulfite processes dominate industrial volumes due to established

infrastructure, sulfur incorporation drastically restricts high-value application in catalytic refining and

biomedical nanomedicine. Conversely, sulfur-free processes such as Organosolv yield pristine, low-

polydispersity fractions rich in reactive native ether linkages (-O-4'), but their economic feasibility remains

severely compromised by capital-intensive solvent recovery units and high operational expenses. Despite

technical advancements in characterization, significant technological limitations persist. 2D HSQC NMR, while

invaluable for linkage profiling, suffers from signal overlap in the side-chain region and requires complete

dissolution in deuterated solvents a condition rarely met by highly condensed technical lignins without prior

derivatization. Similarly, quantitative 31P NMR relies on moisture sensitive phosphitylation reagents that can

hydrolyze, yielding inaccurate hydroxyl counts. On the extraction front, organosolv processes deliver high

purity but are severely limited by high solvent volatility, solvent recovery energy demands, and equipment

corrosion, which prevent widespread adoption over conventional, highly polluting kraft pulping.

7. Quantitative industrial and biological bioactivities

Lignin's multi-functional phenolic framework underpins a broad range of biological and industrial bioactivities.

[12,15]

Rather than relying on qualitative descriptors, Table 4 and Table 5 provides explicit, peer-reviewed

quantitative metrics evaluating antioxidant capacity, UV-shielding performance, antimicrobial inhibition, drug

delivery encapsulation, and agricultural functional efficacy across specific lignin forms.

Table 4: Quantitative performance benchmarks of lignin formulations across industrial, biomedical, and agricultural

bioactivities

[13,15-17,41-46]

Functional Category

Lignin Type /

Formulation

Principal Mechanism

Quantitative

Performance Metric

Representative

Reference

Antioxidant Activity

Organosolv Lignin

Fraction

(Low Mw, high

phenolic -OH)

Hydrogen atom

transfer (HAT) &

single electron

transfer (SET) to

radicals

DPPH scavenging IC50:

9.2 - 15.4 µg/mL

ABTS inhibition: >88% at

50 µg/mL

[15,41]

UV-Shielding /

Photoprotection

Lignin Nanoparticles

(LNPs) in PLLA / PVA

films

Aromatic

chromophore broad-

spectrum absorption

(UV-A & UV-B)

UV blocking: >98% at 2

wt% LNP loading

Film SPF rating: 15 to

45+

[16,42]

Antimicrobial Activity

Fractionated Kraft

Lignin &

Copper-LNP

composites

Cell membrane

disruption,

intracellular ROS

generation, cell lysis

MIC vs S. aureus: 0.25 -

0.50 mg/mL

MIC vs E. coli: 0.50 - 1.00

mg/mL

[43,44]

Drug Delivery Carrier

Self-assembled

Hollow LNPs

(Targeted delivery)

Hydrophobic core

encapsulation & pH-

responsive aromatic

pi-pi stacking

Paclitaxel Encapsulation

Efficiency (EE): 82 - 94%

Drug Loading (DL): 12 -

18 wt%

[13,17]

Agricultural

Applications

Lignosulfonate-

coated Urea &

Lignin Hydrogel

Matrices

Slow diffusion barrier

coating & high

moisture retention

chelating capacity

Nitrogen release delayed

by 21-35 days;

Soil moisture retention

increased +32%

[45,46]

Table 5: Quantitative performance metrics of technical lignins and lignin nanoparticles (LNPs) across functional

activities

Study / Lignin

Type

Specific Formulation

& Particle Size

Targeted Activity

Quantitative Metric & Baseline

Value

Absorption Range / Load

Efficacy

Kraft Lignin

Unfractionated

powder ( m)

Antioxidant

DPPH radical inhibition:  



(



   g/mL)

N/A

Organosolv

Lignin

Low 



fraction

(  nm

LNPs)

Antioxidant

DPPH radical inhibition: 



(



   g/mL)

N/A

Acetylated Kraft

LNPs

Nano-spheres ( 

nm)

UV-Shielding /

Photoprotection

UV blocking: 

Film SPF rating:    

Absorbs across full UV-A

(  nm) & UV-B

(  nm)

spectrum

Alkali / Soda

LNPs

Hollow spheres

(  nm)

Targeted Drug

Delivery

Encapsulation Efficiency (EE):

  

Drug Loading (DL):  

 wt

High hydrophobic drug

entrapment (e.g.,

Paclitaxel, Aspirin)

Fractionated

Kraft Lignin

Micro/Nano-colloids

(  nm)

Antimicrobial

Activity

 aureus MIC:  

mg/mL

 coli MIC:   mg/mL

Cell lysis via intracellular

ROS generation

8. Critical analysis, challenges, and future perspectives

While several studies report strong antioxidant (DPPH IC50 <15 µg/mL) and antimicrobial efficacy for

organosolv and kraft lignins, conflicting findings exist in the literature. For instance, antioxidant performance

varies drastically depending on the solvent system used for extraction, as residual hydrogen-bonding solvents

can mask phenolic -OH reactivity. Similarly, reported antimicrobial MIC values range broadly from 0.25 mg/mL

to >10 mg/mL. This discrepancy stems from inconsistent bioassay protocols (e.g., dispersion methods, particle

size variations, and bacterial strains used) rather than intrinsic chemical differences alone. A systematic

standardization of radical and microbial assay conditions is required to resolve these literature contradictions.

7.1. Antioxidant and free radical scavenging mechanisms

The antioxidant activity of lignin is primarily mediated by its phenolic hydroxyl groups, which readily donate

hydrogen atoms to neutralize free radicals, forming stable, resonance-stabilized phenoxy radical intermediates.

[15,41]

Quantitative evaluations using 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2'-azino-bis(3-

ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) assays demonstrate that low molecular weight, highly non-

condensed organosolv lignin fractions exhibit superior DPPH IC50 values (9.2–15.4 µg/mL), performing

comparably to commercial synthetic antioxidants like BHT (butylated hydroxytoluene).

[41]

Ortho-methoxyl

substitution (characteristic of G and S units) further enhances radical scavenging capacity by stabilizing

phenoxy radicals through electron donation and intramolecular hydrogen bonding.

[15,40]

7.2. Antimicrobial efficacy and photoprotective uv-shielding

Lignin-derived phenolic compounds exert potent antimicrobial action against Gram-positive (e.g.,

Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis) and Gram-negative (e.g., Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa)

pathogens.

[43,44]

Mechanisms include damaging bacterial cell membrane integrity, inducing intracellular

oxidative stress, and lysing cell walls.

[43]

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for organosolv and

fractionated kraft lignins range from 0.25 to 1.00 mg/mL.

[44]

When incorporated as nanoparticles into active

food packaging films (e.g., poly(lactic acid) or polyvinyl alcohol), lignin provides total UV-blocking (>98% UV-

A and UV-B absorption) at low loadings (1–2 wt%), preventing photo-oxidation and extending food shelf life

without compromising transparency.

[16,42]

7.3. Agricultural valorization: controlled-release & soil hydrogels

Agricultural applications represent one of the most immediate, economically viable, and scalable non-

combustion pathways for technical lignins.

[45,46]

Controlled-release fertilizers (CRFs): Lignosulfonates and modified kraft lignins serve as hydrophobic,

biodegradable barrier coatings for granular urea and NPK fertilizers. Coated urea granules delay nitrogen

dissolution by 21 to 35 days, reducing nitrate leaching into groundwater by up to  and minimizing ammonia

volatilization loss.

[46]

• Soil conditioners and superabsorbent hydrogels: Polymerized lignin matrices cross-linked with acrylic

acid or vinyl monomers form superabsorbent hydrogel networks capable of increasing soil moisture

retention by  in arid sandy soils. These networks chelate essential micronutrients (Fe



, Zn



), protecting them from premature soil immobilization and enhancing root uptake efficiency.

• Bio-based seed coatings: Formulations combining LNPs with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria or

biopesticides form protective seed films. These coatings shield seeds from soil-borne fungal pathogens via

localized antimicrobial phenolic release while improving seedling germination rates under drought-

induced oxidative stress.

8.1. Techno-economic feasibility and biorefinery scalability

Despite compelling laboratory-scale demonstrations, scaling technical lignin valorization to commercial

operations faces severe techno-economic barriers.

[7,8,47]

High operational costs associated with organic solvent

recovery in organosolv processes and complex purification steps currently limit economic viability.

[8]

Furthermore, batch-to-batch structural heterogeneity derived from seasonal biomass variations and pulping

fluctuations poses severe quality control challenges for industrial polymer formulators.

[7,48]

Scalability remains

the single greatest bottleneck transitioning laboratory successes to commercial supply chains. While self-

assembly protocols yield uniform LNPs at milligram scales using anti-solvent precipitation, scaling these

processes to multi-ton industrial outputs leads to batch-to-batch aggregation, poor size reproducibility, and

high wastewater generation. Furthermore, feedstocks suffer from severe seasonal and geographic

heterogeneity. Variations in S/G ratios across raw biomass batches alter depolymerization yields

unpredictably, making continuous, automated industrial processing extremely difficult to standardize. From an

economic perspective, replacing low value on-site thermal combustion (evaluated at ~$50–$80 per ton as

boiler fuel) with high value biomaterial conversion (potentially >$1,000–$3,000 per ton) requires substantial

capital expenditure. The primary cost drivers in lignin valorization are downstream purification, organic

solvent recycling, and sulfur removal. Until biorefineries achieve high-yield, closed-loop solvent recovery

systems (>98% efficiency), the capital pay-back period for technical lignin refining remains uncompetitive

compared to fossil-based polymer manufacturing.

8.2. Life cycle assessment (lca) and carbon footprint

While lignin is inherently bio-based, its environmental credentials must be verified through rigorous Life Cycle

Assessment (LCA).

[49,50]

Diverting kraft lignin from pulp mill recovery boilers to materials manufacturing

requires replacing its thermal energy with alternative fuel sources, which can offset net carbon savings if fossil

energy is utilized.

[49]

Sustainable biorefineries must balance energy self-sufficiency with material recovery to

achieve true net-zero carbon footprints.

[50]

8.3. Regulatory and translational barriers in biomedical applications

While lignin nanoparticles (LNPs) demonstrate promising in vitro paclitaxel encapsulation efficiencies ( 

), high radical scavenging, and bioimaging fluorescence, assertions of immediate biomedical translation

are significantly overstated. Currently, over  of published biomedical lignin studies remain confined to in

vitro cell assays or small-animal (rodent) models. Virtually no lignin-based nanomedicine has advanced to

Phase I clinical trials or achieved commercial regulatory approval by the FDA or EMA.

[17,51-54]

The path to clinical translation is blocked by severe fundamental barriers:

1. Polydispersity and heterogeneity: Regulatory agencies require strict batch-to-batch chemical

reproducibility, which is inherently difficult for a natural, heterogenous polymer.

[52-55]

2. Toxic impurities: Technical lignins contain residual sulfur, heavy metal catalysts, and organosolv

residues that trigger immunogenic responses and cytotoxicity in vivo.

[56]

3. Pharmacokinetics and accumulation: Long-term in vivo biodistribution, metabolic degradation,

organ accumulation, and renal clearance rates for non-water-soluble LNPs remain largely

unmapped.

[57]

Claims of lignin's near-term viability in human targeted drug delivery, cancer therapy, or clinical diagnostics

must be tempered by the necessity of multi-year, standardized toxicity and clearance evaluations. In biomedical

applications, despite high paclitaxel encapsulation efficiencies (82–94%) observed in vitro, transition to clinical

settings is heavily hindered by regulatory frameworks (e.g., FDA and EMA.

[58,59]

Technical lignins contain

residual sulfur, heavy metals, and carbohydrate residues from extraction processes, which trigger

immunogenic reactions in vivo. Regulatory bodies require precise structural definition and batch

reproducibility for nanocarriers criteria inherently incompatible with lignin’s natural polydispersity and

variable cross-linking. To clear regulatory barriers, long-term pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, long-term

tissue accumulation, and standardized Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) isolation protocols must be

established.

[60-62]

8.4. Standardization and future interdisciplinary outlook

Unlocking the full potential of lignin demands global standardization of technical lignin grades alongside

interdisciplinary collaboration joining plant genetics, analytical chemistry, bioprocess engineering, and

materials science.

[7,8,52]

Metabolic engineering of woody crops (e.g., genetic tuning of S/G ratios or introduction

of labile ester bonds via 'designer lignins') promises feedstocks optimized for effortless depolymerization.

[27,53]

Simultaneously, expanding machine learning models to predict depolymerization yields from 2D HSQC NMR

spectra will accelerate commercial process optimization.

[54,63,64]

9. Conclusion

Lignin-derived polyphenols represent an extraordinary, highly abundant renewable aromatic resource capable

of driving the transition toward a sustainable bio-based economy. This review has provided a comprehensive,

quantitative, and critical synthesis bridging woody plant taxonomy, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, advanced

analytical characterization (2D HSQC NMR, 31P NMR), and industrial process extraction. Quantitative

bioactivity benchmarks clearly demonstrate lignin's high performance across antioxidant, antimicrobial, UV-

protective, drug delivery, and agricultural domains. However, overcoming commercial scalability constraints,

batch heterogeneity, environmental carbon trade-offs, and biomedical regulatory hurdles remains imperative.

Through continued interdisciplinary innovation in green chemistry and metabolic engineering, technical lignins

will undoubtedly emerge as indispensable precursors for next-generation biomaterials, active packaging, and

sustainable chemical platforms.

Acknowledgement

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Forest College and Research Institute, Mettupalayam, and the

Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tiruvannamalai, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, for providing

institutional support and access to scientific literature databases.

CRediT Author Contribution Statement

H. B. Roghan: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization,

Writing - Original draft, Writing - Review & editing. S. Vennila: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project

Administration, Validation, Supervision, Writing - Review & editing. Both the authors have read and approved

the final version of the manuscript for publication and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work,

ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately

investigated and resolved.

Funding Declaration

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-

profit sectors.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no primary experimental datasets were generated or analyzed

during the current review study. All analyzed secondary literature data and quantitative synthesis metrics are

fully included within this published article.

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use Disclosure

The authors declare that artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted tools were used only for language refinement,

grammar improvement, and manuscript structuring purposes during the preparation of this work. All technical

content, experimental implementation, results, and interpretations were independently developed and verified

by the authors.

Supporting Information

Not applicable.

References

[1]

W. Boerjan, J. Ralph, M. Baucher, Lignin biosynthesis, Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2003, 54, 519-

546, doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.134938.

[2]

W. Vanholme, B. Demedts, K. Morreel, J. Ralph, W. Boerjan, Lignin biosynthesis and structure, Plant

Physiology, 2010, 153, 895-905, doi: 10.1104/pp.110.155119.

[3]

L. A. Donaldson, Lignification and lignin topochemistry-an ultrastructural view, Phytochemistry,

2001, 57, 859-873, doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(01)00049-8.

[4]

S. Posé, C. Paniagua, A. J. Matas, A. P. Gunning, V. J. Morris, M. A. Quesada, J A. Mercado, A

nanostructural view of the cell wall disassembly process during fruit ripening and postharvest

storage by atomic force microscopy, Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2019, 87, 47-58, doi:

10.1016/j.tifs.2018.02.011.

[5]

J. Barros, H. Serk, I. Granlund, E. Pesquet, The cell biology of lignification in higher plants, Annals of

Botany, 2015, 115, 1053-1074, doi: 10.1093/aob/mcv046.

[6]

J. Ralph, K. Lundquist, G. Brunow, F. Lu, H. Kim, P.F. Schatz, J.M. Marita, R.D. Hatfield, S.A. Ralph, J.H.

Christensen, W. Boerjan, Lignins: Natural polymers from oxidative coupling of 4-

hydroxyphenylpropanoids, Phytochemistry Reviews, 2004, 3, 29-60, doi:

10.1023/B:PHYT.0000047809.65444.a4.

[7]

B. M. Upton, A.M. Kasko, Strategies for the conversion of lignin to high-value polymeric materials:

Review and perspective, Chemical Reviews, 2016, 116, 2275-2306, doi:

10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00345.

[8]

W. Schutyser, T. Renders, S. Van den Bosch, S.F. Koelewijn, G.T. Beckham, B.F. Sels, Chemicals from

lignin: An interplay of lignocellulose fractionation, depolymerisation, and upgrading, Chemical

Society Reviews, 2018, 47, 852-908, doi: 10.1039/C7CS00566K.

[9]

A. J. Ragauskas, G.T. Beckham, M.J. Biddy, R. Chandra, F. Chen, M.F. Davis, B.H. Davison, R.A. Dixon, P.

Gilna, M. Keller, P. Langan, Lignin valorization: Improving lignin processing in the biorefinery,

Science, 2014, 344, 1246843, doi: 10.1126/science.1246843.

[10]

S. Constant, C.S. Barta, O.V. Kikhtyanin, K. Drijkoningen, Comparison of five technical lignins: A

structure-reactivity study, Green Chemistry, 2016, 18, 2651-2665, doi: 10.1039/C5GC03043A.

[11]

Z. Sun, B. Fridrich, A. de Santi, Bright side of lignin depolymerization: Toward platform chemicals,

Chemical Reviews, 2018, 118, 614-678, doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00588.

[12]

D. Kai, M.J. Tan, P.L. Chee, Y.K. Chua, Y.L. Yap, X.J. Loh, Towards lignin-based functional materials in a

sustainable world, Green Chemistry, 2016, 18, 1175-1200, doi: 10.1039/C5GC02616D.

[13]

R. Kumar, A. Butreddy, N. Kommineni, P. G. Reddy, N. Bunekar, C. Sarkar, S. Dutt, V. K. Mishra, K. R.

Aadil, Y. K. Mishra, D. Oupicky, Lignin: drug/gene delivery and tissue engineering applications,

International Journal of Nanomedicine, 2021, 2419-2441, doi: 10.2147/IJN.S303462.

[14]

Y. Zhao, M. Abid, X. Xie, Y. Fu, Y. Huang, Z. Cai, H. Lin, Harnessing unconventional monomers to tailor

lignin structures for lignocellulosic biomass valorization. Forestry Research. 2024, 4, e004, doi:

10.48130/forres-0024-0001.

[15]

T. Dizhbite, G. Telysheva, S. Viviers, A. Viksna, L. Paegle, Lignin-A valuable source of phenolic

antioxidants, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2004, 52, 1801-1808.

[16]

W. Yang, E. Fortunati, F. Dominici, G. Giovanale, A. Mazzaglia, G.M. Balestra, J.M. Kenny, D. Puglia,

Effect of cellulose and lignin on disintegration, antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of PLA active

films, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2016, 89, 360-368, doi:

10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.04.068.

[17]

R. Liu, L. Dai, C. Xu, K. Wang, C. Zheng, C. Si, Lignin-based micro- and nanomaterials and their

composites in biomedical applications, ChemSusChem, 2020, 13, 4266–4283, doi:

10.1002/cssc.202000783.

[18]

C. G. Yoo, X. Meng, Y. Pu, A.J. Ragauskas, The critical role of advanced characterization techniques in

lignin valorization, Green Chemistry, 2020, 22, 3993-4019.

[19]

C. Crestini, F. Melone, M. Sette, D.S. Argyropoulos, The structural heterogeneity of lignin: A

quantitative NMR study, Biomacromolecules, 2011, 12, 3928-3938.

[20]

M. J. Page, J.E. McKenzie, P.M. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, T.C. Hoffmann, C.D. Mulrow, L. Shamseer, J. M.

Tetzlaff, E. A. Akl, S. E. Brennan, R. Chou, The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for

reporting systematic reviews, BMJ, 2021, 372, doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.

[21]

R. A. Dixon, J. Barros, Lignin biosynthesis: Old roads revisited and new avenues explored, New

Phytologist, 2019, 223, 1086-1092, doi: 10.1111/nph.15743.

[22]

Q. Zhao, R.A. Dixon, Transcriptional networks for lignin biosynthesis: More complex than we

thought?, Trends in Plant Science, 2011, 16, 227-233, doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.12.005.

[23]

A. Wagner, J. Ralph, T. Akiyama, H. Kitano, Exploring monolignol biosynthesis in gymnosperms,

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007, 104, 14256-

14261, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706338104.

[24]

M. Li, Y. Pu, A.J. Ragauskas, Current advancements including genomics and metabolic engineering for

optimizing lignin structure and utilization, Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2019, 56, 205-212,

[25]

J. K. Weng, C. Chapple, The origin and evolution of lignin biosynthesis, New Phytologist, 2010, 187,

273-285, doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03327.x.

[26]

J. J. Stewart, T. Akiyama, C. Chapple, J. Ralph, S.D. Mansfield, The effect of altering the S/G ratio in

poplar wood lignification, Plant Physiology, 2009, 150, 621-635.

[27]

Y. Mottiar, R. Vanholme, W. Boerjan, J. Ralph, S.D. Mansfield, Designer lignins: Harnessing the

plasticity of lignification, Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2016, 37, 190-200, doi:

10.1016/j.copbio.2015.10.009.

[28]

Y. Tobimatsu, M. Schuetz, Lignin polymerization: How do plants manage the radical reaction?, Current

Opinion in Plant Biology, 2019, 48, 85-93, doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2018.10.001.

[29]

M. J. Meents, Y. Watanabe, A.L. Samuels, The cell biology of secondary cell wall biosynthesis, Annals

of Botany, 2018, 121, 1107-1125, doi: 10.1093/aob/mcy005.

[30]

R. Hatfield, W. Vermerris, Lignin formation in plants. The dilemma of linkage specificity, Plant

Physiology, 2001, 126, 1351-1357, doi: 10.1104/pp.126.4.1351.

[31]

K. Morreel, J. Ralph, H. Kim, F. Lu, G. Goeminne, S.A. Ralph, W. Boerjan, Profiling of oligolignols reveals

pathways for lignin formation, Plant Physiology, 2004, 136, 3537-3549, doi:

10.1104/pp.104.049304.

[32]

R. B. Santos, E. A. Capanema, M.Y. Balakshin, H. Jameel, Effect of hardwoods characteristics on kraft

pulping process: emphasis on lignin structure, BioResources, 2011, 6, 3623.

[33]

C. S. Lancefield, O.S. Ojo, F. Tran, N.J. Westwood, Isolation of functionalized phenolic monomers

through the catalytic depolymerization of lignin, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2015, 54,

258-262, doi: 10.1002/anie.201409408.

[34]

V. Ugartondo, M. Mitjans, M. P. Vinardell, Applicability of lignins from different sources as

antioxidants based on the protective effects on lipid peroxidation induced by oxygen radicals,

Industrial Crops and Products. 2009, 30, 184-187, doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2009.03.001.

[35]

J. Ralph, Hydroxycinnamates in lignification, Phytochemical Reviews, 2010, 9, 65-83, doi:

10.1007/s11101-009-9141-9.

[36]

A. D. Roy, R. Kumar, P. Gupta, T. Khaliq, T. Narender, V. Aggarwal, R. Roy, Xyloccensin X and Y, two

new limonoids from xylocarpus molluccensis: NMR investigation in mixture, Magnetic Resonance in

Chemistry, 2006, 44, 1054-1057, doi: 10.1002/mrc.1887.

[37]

M. K. Islam, J. Ratthiwal, S. Kongparakul, C. Samart, Advances in oxidative fractionation and

depolymerization for sustainable lignin valorization, Molecular Catalysis, 2025, 586, 115436, doi:

10.1016/j.mcat.2025.115436.

[38]

D. Humpert, M. Ebrahimi, P. Czermak, Membrane technology for the recovery of lignin: A review,

Membranes, 2016, 6, 42, doi: 10.3390/membranes6030042.

[39]

H. Sadeghifar, D.S. Argyropoulos, Correlations of the antioxidant properties of softwood kraft lignin

fractions with their molecular weight and phenolic hydroxyl content, ACS Sustainable Chemistry &

Engineering, 2015, 3, 349-358, doi: 10.1021/sc500756n.

[40]

X. Pan, J.F. Kadla, K. Ehara, S. Saka, Organosolv ethanol lignin from hybrid poplar as a radical

scavenger, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2006, 54, 5806-5813, doi:

10.1021/ie3011043.

[41]

Y. Qian; X. Qiu, X. Zhong; D. Zhang; Y. Deng; D. Yang; S. Zhu, Lignin Reverse Micelles for UV-Absorbing

and High Mechanical Performance Thermoplastics, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research,

2015, 54, 12025-12030, doi: 10.1021/ie3011043.

[42]

S. Sholahuddin, D. Y. Arinawati, V. K. Nathan, C. Asada, Y. Nakamura, Antioxidant and antimicrobial

activities of lignin-derived products from all steam-exploded palm oil mill lignocellulosic biomass

waste, Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, 2024, 11, 5, doi: 10.1186/s40538-023-

00529-x.

[43]

S. You, Y. Xie, X. Zhuang, H. Chen, Y. Qin, J. Cao, T. Lan, Effect of high antioxidant activity on

bacteriostasis of lignin from sugarcane bagasse, Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 180, 108335,

doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2022.108335.

[44]

J. Behin, N. Sadeghi, Utilization of waste lignin to prepare controlled-slow-release urea, International

Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 2016, 5, 289–299, doi: 10.1007/s40093-016-

0139-1.

[45]

A. Verma, P. Devi, S. Bhogal, R. Jasrotia, V. K. Thakur, Lignin-Based Hydrogels for Sustainable

Agriculture: Extraction, Design, and Applications, ACS Environmental Au. 2026, 6, 375, doi:

10.1021/acsenvironau.5c00203.

[46]

E. J. Beckman, Green chemical engineering and lignin valorization: Current status and future

prospects, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2022, 61, 3801-3815.

[47]

R. Rinaldi, R. Jastrzebski, M.T. Clough, Paving the way for lignin valorisation: Recent advances in bio-

refining, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2016, 55, 8164-8115.

[48]

C. Culbertson, F. Hermansson, Life cycle assessment of technical lignin valorization pathways:

Thermal vs material utilization, Bioresource Technology, 2021, 335, 125270, doi:

10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125270.

[49]

B. Corona, L. Shen, D. Reiner, Environmental sustainability assessment of biorefinery lignin

valorization products, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 82, 2231-2241, doi:

10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.034.

[50]

N. Feng, X. Zhao, J. Hu, F. Tang, S. Liang, Q. Wu, C. Zhang, Recent advance in preparation of lignin

nanoparticles and their medical applications: A review, Phytomedicine, 2024, 130, 155711, doi:

10.1016/j.phymed.2024.155711.

[51]

I. Ullah, Z. Chen, Y. Xie, S.S. Khan, S. Singh, C. Yu, G. Cheng, Recent advances in biological activities of

lignin and emerging biomedical applications: A short review, International Journal of Biological

Macromolecules, 2022, 208, 819-832, doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.03.182.

[52]

D.A. Ali, M.M. Mehanna, Role of lignin-based nanoparticles in anticancer drug delivery and

bioimaging: An up-to-date review, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2022, 221,

934-953, doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.09.045.

[53]

R. Liu, L. Dai, C. Xu, K. Wang, C. Zheng, C. Si, Lignin-based micro- and nanomaterials and their

composites in biomedical applications, ChemSusChem, 2020, 13, 4266-4283.

[54]

A. Gilca, V.I. Popa, C. Crestini, Obtaining lignin nanoparticles by sonication, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry,

2015, 23, 369-375.

[55]

M. Lievonen, J.J. Valle-Delgado, M.L. Mattinen, A simple route to produce micro- and nanoparticles

from kraft lignin, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2016, 469, 341-349, doi:

10.1016/j.jcis.2016.02.012.

[56]

F. Zikeli, V. Vinciguerra, A. D'Annibale, Preparation and characterization of lignin nanoparticles for

biomedical applications, Nanomaterials, 2020, 10, 1385, doi: 10.3390/nano10071385.

[57]

Q. Lu, X. Liu, C. Dong, Antioxidant activity of technical lignins extracted from agricultural residues,

BioResources, 2021, 16, 2411-2425, doi: 10.15376/biores.16.2.2411-2425.

[58]

T. Demura, Z.H. Ye, Regulation of plant biomass biosynthesis, Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2010,

13, 299-303.

[59]

F. Lu, J. Ralph, Detection and determination of p-coumaroylated units in lignins, Journal of

Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1999, 47, 1988-1992, doi: 10.1021/jf981140j.

[60]

H. Kim, J. Ralph, Solution-state 2D NMR of ball-milled plant cell wall gels in DMSO-d6/pyridine-d5,

Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry, 2010, 8, 576-591, doi: 10.1039/B915298H.

[61]

J. C. Del Río, J. Rencoret, P. Prinsen, Á. T. Martínez, J. Ralph, A. Gutiérrez, Structural characterization

of wheat straw lignin as revealed by analytical pyrolysis, 2D-NMR, and reductive cleavage methods,

Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2012, 60, 5922-5935, doi: 10.1021/jf301002n.

[62]

E. A. Capanema, M.Y. Balakshin, J.F. Kadla, Quantitative characterization of a hardwood milled wood

lignin by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2005,

53, 9639-9649, doi: 10.1021/jf0515330.

[63]

T. Akiyama, T. Sugimoto, Y. Matsumoto, G. Meshitsuka, Erythro/threo ratio of β-O-4 structures as an

important structural characteristic of lignin. I: Improvement of ozonation method for the quantitative

analysis of lignin side-chain structure, Journal of Wood Science, 2002, 48, 210-215, doi:

10.1007/BF00771369.

[64]

H. Grabber, How do lignin composition, structure, and cross-linking affect degradability?, Crop

Science, 2005, 45, 2-13, doi: 10.2135/cropsci2004.0191.

Publisher Note: The views, statements, and data in all publications solely belong to the authors and

contributors. GR Scholastic is not responsible for any injury resulting from the ideas, methods, or products

mentioned. GR Scholastic remains neutral regarding jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional

affiliations.

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which

permits the non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format,

as long as appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source is given by providing a link to the Creative

Commons License and changes need to be indicated if there are any. The images or other third-party material

in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons License, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line

to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons License and your intended use is

not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly

from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this License, visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-

nc/4.0/